Thursday, December 30, 2010

Truthout.org has awarded Canada ...

The Golden Lemon Award goes to the Conservative government of Canada for shelling out $8.5 billion to buy 65 Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth fighters. According to Defense Minister Peter MacKay, “This multi-role stealth fighter will help the Canadian forces defend the sovereignty of Canadian airspace.” Exactly whom that airspace is being defended from is not clear.

The contract also includes a $6.6 billion maintenance agreement, which is a good thing because the F-35 has a number of “problems.” For instance, its engine shoots out sparks, and no one can figure out why. It is generally thought a bad idea for an engine to do that. There are several different types of F-35, and the vertical lift version of the aircraft doesn’t work very well. It seems the fan that cools the engine, doesn’t, and the panels that open for the vertical thrust, don’t. Also switches, valves and power systems are considered “unreliable.”

The F-35 is looking more and more like the old F-105 Thunderchief, a fighter-bomber used extensively at the beginning of the Vietnam War. Pilots nicknamed it the “Thud” (the sound the plane made when it hit the ground after failing to clear a runway, a rather common occurrence). One pilot said it had all the agility of a “flying brick,” thus its other nickname: the “lead sled.”

The U.S. is spending $382 billion to buy 2,457 F-35s, although the price tag keeps going up as more and more “problems” develop. Maintenance and spare parts for the aircraft will run several hundred billion extra.

One normally thinks of Canadians as sensible, but the country’s Conservative government is apparently as thickheaded as our own. Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently had a summit meeting on the Arctic and didn’t invite the Inuit (whom most Americans call Eskimos).

Well, the F-35 may not fly very well, but it works just fine for Lockheed Martin: second quarter profits saw a jump from $727 million to $731 million over last year, and revenues rose to $11.44 billion, 3 percent over last year.

Here's a year-end progress summary ...

for your contemplation ( yeah, I know, nobody contemplates anymore...)

http://original.antiwar.com/paul-craig-roberts/2010/12/29/cheering-for-wikileaks-demise-is-cheering-for-our-own/

Buy gold, ... bullion .... if you don't want to pay capital gains taxes.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

A glimmer of hope ...

... regarding the insanity of our drug laws:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/british-defense-secretary-time-legalize-regulate-drugs/'

The only possible reason for continuing with our current anti-drug regime is that politicians are being paid off by the 'criminals' to keep laws in place that will result in ludicrous street prices for simple chemicals and herbs which cannot (as yet) be patented by large corporations.

I would really like to see a proper cost/benefit study done regarding our drug policy which gets beyond the 'one reefer always leads to crack cocaine addiction' argument. By the way, what's wrong with having a bunch of addicts buying well-taxed drugs from the state to support their habits? They probably would not be any worse than the alcoholics and pillcoholics with whom we routinely associate (knowingly or not) during our day to day lives.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

A petition to support Wikileaks

You might feel like adding your name to this document:

https://sites.google.com/site/wilibeaks/

Wouldn't it be nice if everyone signed it.

Trusting Politicians wrt War

Here's something to consider when expressing support for our government's military adventures:

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2010-12-14.asp

Looking back, were the original goals that were presented by governments to start their wars ever achieved? Discuss this question from the point of view of the aggressor and the "good guys".

If only Wikileaks had been around in the past ... ... how many lives might have been saved? Discuss this question from the point of view of the aggressor and the "good guys".

Discuss who, exactly, are the aggressors and who are the good guys in each war you care to mention.

Oh, yeah, don't forget to support the troops. ... From both sides. You just can't have a war without them. After all, you wouldn't want the rich and powerful to have to actually, physically, fight ( and maybe die or be maimed) for their side in the wars they support, would you?

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Assange's sins exposed!

Here is one version of the case against Julian Assange, for those who might be interested in the details:

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/12/07/julian-assange-in-the-honey-trap/

Better to think about this boring puerile BS than the implications of the information that Wikileaks and several world famous newspapers have presented to the world.

Why is nobody declaiming these leaking newspapers in the same vehement fashion that is being used to destroy Wikileaks (seized bank accounts, credit card companies refusing to pay donations made by individuals to Wikileaks, websites arbitrarily closed etc., etc.)?

Monday, December 6, 2010

Persecution of Wikileaks continues

Glenn Greenwald summarizes the illegal war against Wikileaks;

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/06/wikileaks/index.html

We are witnessing a truly pivotal time in western civilizations. Do we embrace the thuggery and criminal behaviour of those in power, or do we insist that the rule of law be enforced in our countries?

Could be the beginning of a new Dark Age.

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Where to find Wikileaks

Don't read this if you want to be a friend of the establishment:

http://news.antiwar.com/2010/12/03/wikileaks-registrar-problems-leave-site-difficult-to-reach/

Bookmark the page at the link above so that you can keep up with the latest active URLs for Wikileaks.

This is typical of repressive police states

http://news.antiwar.com/2010/12/03/state-dept-warning-students-not-to-read-share-wikileaks/

If you even attempt to learn what's going on, you are the enemy of the state.

Friday, December 3, 2010

What our government should be devoting its efforts toward:

Read this article (from an unlikely source) and ask yourself why we are pouring money, blood and our reputation into Afghanistan.

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/features/2010/11/20101130181427770987.html

Al Jazeera seems to have a better handle on Canada's reasonable priorities than our government!

State of the confusion ...

Ponder this statement:

"An alert and informed citizenry, valued by presidents from Washington to Eisenhower, is now deemed by D.C. to be a nascent domestic terrorism threat."

Guess at its author. See HERE for the answer

Discuss its relevancy to our current era.